|
Emerging topics we picked up on in the 64 HR Tech articles we scanned this week: - AI-generated 'resume slop' creates a crisis in candidate signal-to-noise ratios
- HR teams face mounting AI 'hidden tax' and legal scrutiny over automated screening
- Embedded payroll and AI-driven benefits administration become primary growth drivers for SaaS
Read the full Week in Review →
|
| |
|
|
|
Elon Musk's recent job posting, which attracted AI-assisted applicants, prompts discussion about the uncertain future direction of talent acquisition processes.
|
|
Read at HR Executive→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Should recruiters openly use AI tools to filter candidates based on Musk's unconventional hiring reveal?
|
|
|
Prospective buyers of applicant tracking systems must focus their vendor evaluation beyond polished demonstration workflows to address the practical operational realities of recruiting technology implementation.
|
|
Read at HR Morning→
|
|
|
|
|
A new data infrastructure partnership is enabling organizations to implement skills-first methodologies for scaling their hiring processes effectively.
|
|
Read at HRTech Series→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
A recent class action lawsuit targeting Eightfold underscores the growing necessity for human resources leaders to ensure compliance as artificial intelligence hiring tools become integrated into critical workforce workflows.
|
|
Read at HR Morning→
|
|
|
|
|
Workday is arguing in a lawsuit that job applicants cannot bring disparate impact claims related to the use of artificial intelligence in hiring tools.
|
|
Read at HR Dive→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The future of human resources is being reshaped by four distinct trends centered around the implementation of artificial intelligence.
|
|
Read at HRTech Series→
|
|
|
|
|
Senior finance leaders are planning their largest technology investment in five years, requiring human resources departments to understand how these spending allocations will impact their technology infrastructure and planning.
|
|
Read at HR Morning→
|
|
|
|
|
Human resources must implement a 'recovery layer' to support employees continuously adapting to new artificial intelligence implementation without adequate psychological support design.
|
|
Read at HR Executive→
|
|
|
|
| |
Corporate learning and skills development
|
|
A Pearson report suggests that prioritizing extensive training for employees on artificial intelligence implementation, rather than using it for worker replacement, could unlock the return on investment companies are currently missing, potentially adding up to $6.6 trillion to the United States economy.
|
|
Read at HR Dive→
|
|
|
|
|
Spire.AI and CrossKnowledge are partnering to overhaul enterprise learning and accelerate skills-based transformations for talent management.
|
|
Read at HRTech Series→
|
|
|
|
|
Docebo has finalized the acquisition of 365Talents, likely expanding its corporate learning or talent technology capabilities.
|
|
Read at HRTech Series→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Earned Wage Access
|
|
New research indicates a significant shift is occurring in the earned wage access landscape, suggesting a major evolution for this component of workforce management technology.
|
|
Read at HR Executive→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
“Candidates can tell when your messages are AI-generated and they hate it”
|
|
Empirical testing revealed that AI-drafted outreach messages yielded a response rate less than a third of personalized messages, suggesting candidates detect the overly polished, personality-lacking tone and prefer human quirks.
|
|
Read at r/recruiting→
|
|
|
|
|
“"Entry level" role wanted 5 interviews, a 6 hour take home, and my references before even speaking to me”
|
|
A candidate recounts enduring a grueling, multi-stage interview process for an 'entry level' role, complete with a massive unpaid take-home assignment and demands for references before the final stages, only to be rejected after discovering the advertised remote position was actually a lower-paid contract role requiring office presence.
|
|
Read at r/recruitinghell→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Would you implement a six-hour take-home assessment for a role advertised as 'entry level'?
|
|
|
“I analyzed 5,000 "Urgent" job postings via API. My script found that ~40% are "Ghost Jobs" with zero "Hiring Intent"”
|
|
A developer utilized an intent-engine script to analyze thousands of urgent job postings, concluding that nearly half are automated 'ghost jobs' created by corporations to inflate perceived growth for investors, effectively farming candidate hope and data.
|
|
Read at r/recruitinghell→
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Should job boards automatically penalize or flag postings identified as high-probability 'Ghost Jobs'?
|
|
| |